The army or the state: Which is more important?
Perhaps this may be the first time that the world in its entirety watches the rise and fall of a military coup in its full barbaric characterization. A coup that is usually conducted by the imperialist countries in the Third World countries, from Iran to Syria to Egypt, Turkey, Sudan, Pakistan, Algeria, Libya, in addition to countries in Africa and Latin America.
Turkish officials and politicians like Abdullah Gul, Ahmed Davutoglu and the entire Turkish opposition reiterated during the failed attempt and after, that Turkey no longer resembles those countries (Third World) in which such barbaric coups succeed.
However, the truth that was manifested on July 15, 2016 was that the great progress that was accomplished by the Turkish nation in various areas was not enough to transfer the country from the Third World to the modern world, as long as there are men, with large military boots, thinking that they can bombard the parliament and turn the tables on all the politicians of the country.
Perhaps this was the boundary line that prevented an important country like Turkey to transition from that classification to a layer of civilized nations, in which no German, British or American army can think of plotting a coup against the political power no matter how disastrous it was. And there are hundreds of examples when the European political elite committed mistakes without being confronted by their armies.
So what is the role of the army and the role of the ruling class and what are the limits that distinguish between the powers of the two teams? In the developed countries of the world, the army follows the political power and complies to it no matter how different and varied that power is from government to government and no matter what confrontations the army is plunged into, as George Bush and Blair did in Iraq and Nixon in Vietnam and even in countries such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
However, the composition of the modern nations in the East is a composition which is designed and engineered in the kitchens of Western policy, where the army is the blind military force in the face of politicians. These armies are infiltrated to the core by the West; all of their officers and leaders have studied and are studying for decades and generations in the West. This is what happened with Mossadegh in Iran when he tried to clash with the West, and happened four times in Turkey, most recently with the Turkish army arresting 650 thousand people opposing the West. This is what also happened dozens of times in Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Algeria. Time after time the army turned against the state raising hollow slogans to correct the situation and uphold the rights of the nation and the people, who often are too late to realize what is going on until they have been shackled once again.
The worst of what the West was able to stash in the constitutions of the East is the army’s sanctity and importance, the incitement to the deification of its elements and its immunity.
In addition, in some countries, the army’s intervention in the government reached the economy and possession of wealth and properties; these armies are soaked with corruption and conspiracies to the core.
Some revolutionary guards own the oil wells that army runs the pasta plants, and another army controls the smuggling traffic and ports; corruption dressed in military uniform and decorated with slogans of pride and medals of shame, until it reached a stage where the military boot stands on the heads of the citizens. The dreadful combat boots turned into a vase, while national songs are frequently chanted in children’s schools, in which there are no meanings to its words except for the sanctification of the soldiers and raising them to the level of saints. Meanwhile, these armies kill, torture and enslave ordinary citizens on a daily bases, turning them into hostages of the concept of force that has been unable to accomplish anything but devote misery for the citizens.
These armies are underdogs in the battlefields and bullies to their people, whose filthy stench of their black combat boots is set to cover the skies of their countries’ capitals.
In the end and when the clock strikes, they renege on power – whatever that power might be, whether we agree with it or not – and abuse it by passing on the policies stated by the states that sponsor these coups, making sure that those countries stay in the darkness of the Third World. In Syria, the Syrian National Army was dissolved and a private one was rebuilt, called the Oriental Army, which completed all the policies France and its allies demanded. This is what happened in Algeria, Iran, and the 2003 Iraq.
The State simply means enabling the capital to recover and work freely, to provide equal opportunity and faith in multilateralism and to make a calm dialogue to achieve the interests of the people, regardless of the world’s acceptance. However, the army – which is addicted to buying weapons from the West and which gathers its members through mandatory service, collecting as much as possible from the mildly educated and limited thinkers – cannot negotiate without the use of violence; they consider the word “Professor” to be the biggest possible insult that could be directed at the military. All they do is burn their own countries. And this is what is happening and will happen until the concept of mandatory service turns into voluntary service of science, which could break the gangs of the officers plotting amongst each other and those connected with the outside. This is what the Turks will try to do now so they can jump with their country away from the Third World, which is governed by traitor and foolish armies.
Any government which cannot convince its people of its laws and the conditions of its rule, will deliberately place the army at the forefront to bully its people into accepting these enforced laws and conditions, and this is what is already happening in the pan-Arab countries, until now at least.
Turkish officials and politicians like Abdullah Gul, Ahmed Davutoglu and the entire Turkish opposition reiterated during the failed attempt and after, that Turkey no longer resembles those countries (Third World) in which such barbaric coups succeed.
However, the truth that was manifested on July 15, 2016 was that the great progress that was accomplished by the Turkish nation in various areas was not enough to transfer the country from the Third World to the modern world, as long as there are men, with large military boots, thinking that they can bombard the parliament and turn the tables on all the politicians of the country.
Perhaps this was the boundary line that prevented an important country like Turkey to transition from that classification to a layer of civilized nations, in which no German, British or American army can think of plotting a coup against the political power no matter how disastrous it was. And there are hundreds of examples when the European political elite committed mistakes without being confronted by their armies.
So what is the role of the army and the role of the ruling class and what are the limits that distinguish between the powers of the two teams? In the developed countries of the world, the army follows the political power and complies to it no matter how different and varied that power is from government to government and no matter what confrontations the army is plunged into, as George Bush and Blair did in Iraq and Nixon in Vietnam and even in countries such as Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
However, the composition of the modern nations in the East is a composition which is designed and engineered in the kitchens of Western policy, where the army is the blind military force in the face of politicians. These armies are infiltrated to the core by the West; all of their officers and leaders have studied and are studying for decades and generations in the West. This is what happened with Mossadegh in Iran when he tried to clash with the West, and happened four times in Turkey, most recently with the Turkish army arresting 650 thousand people opposing the West. This is what also happened dozens of times in Syria, Iraq, Egypt and Algeria. Time after time the army turned against the state raising hollow slogans to correct the situation and uphold the rights of the nation and the people, who often are too late to realize what is going on until they have been shackled once again.
The worst of what the West was able to stash in the constitutions of the East is the army’s sanctity and importance, the incitement to the deification of its elements and its immunity.
In addition, in some countries, the army’s intervention in the government reached the economy and possession of wealth and properties; these armies are soaked with corruption and conspiracies to the core.
Some revolutionary guards own the oil wells that army runs the pasta plants, and another army controls the smuggling traffic and ports; corruption dressed in military uniform and decorated with slogans of pride and medals of shame, until it reached a stage where the military boot stands on the heads of the citizens. The dreadful combat boots turned into a vase, while national songs are frequently chanted in children’s schools, in which there are no meanings to its words except for the sanctification of the soldiers and raising them to the level of saints. Meanwhile, these armies kill, torture and enslave ordinary citizens on a daily bases, turning them into hostages of the concept of force that has been unable to accomplish anything but devote misery for the citizens.
These armies are underdogs in the battlefields and bullies to their people, whose filthy stench of their black combat boots is set to cover the skies of their countries’ capitals.
In the end and when the clock strikes, they renege on power – whatever that power might be, whether we agree with it or not – and abuse it by passing on the policies stated by the states that sponsor these coups, making sure that those countries stay in the darkness of the Third World. In Syria, the Syrian National Army was dissolved and a private one was rebuilt, called the Oriental Army, which completed all the policies France and its allies demanded. This is what happened in Algeria, Iran, and the 2003 Iraq.
The State simply means enabling the capital to recover and work freely, to provide equal opportunity and faith in multilateralism and to make a calm dialogue to achieve the interests of the people, regardless of the world’s acceptance. However, the army – which is addicted to buying weapons from the West and which gathers its members through mandatory service, collecting as much as possible from the mildly educated and limited thinkers – cannot negotiate without the use of violence; they consider the word “Professor” to be the biggest possible insult that could be directed at the military. All they do is burn their own countries. And this is what is happening and will happen until the concept of mandatory service turns into voluntary service of science, which could break the gangs of the officers plotting amongst each other and those connected with the outside. This is what the Turks will try to do now so they can jump with their country away from the Third World, which is governed by traitor and foolish armies.
Any government which cannot convince its people of its laws and the conditions of its rule, will deliberately place the army at the forefront to bully its people into accepting these enforced laws and conditions, and this is what is already happening in the pan-Arab countries, until now at least.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق